Fae March 7, at 2: It gets to the heart of what the multibillion-dollar enterprise that is the NCAA thinks not just of its athletes, but of its core business model. This entry was posted in Uncategorized on. It is not their job to play sports; it is an extracurricular activity that is pursued while pursuing a higher education.
Real skills like balancing a budget, living within one's means and writing a check can be acquired during this time. Would athletes be paid differently depending on the sport they play. If that athlete does not feel like doing his or her work then most of the time they will not do it.
InShabazz Napier was quoted: The money to pay athletes must come from somewhere, which might put the least-popular college programs at risk of being cut. That case is Vanskike v.
There are many other types of injuries besides concussions that athletes may sustain. It was detailed very much and gave me all the information I needed.
What do you think. We depend on the support of readers like you to help keep our nonprofit newsroom strong and independent. Those who say college student-athletes should not be paid argue that they receive scholarships as a form of payment for their talents.
I was given a full scholarship to a D-1 school, MSU to be exact. This unneeded responsibility can affect them in many ways. Why would players stay in school when they can get to the big leagues and have some of those material possessions that many students flaunt. But the amendment has an important carve-out: It might lead some players to stick around and work on a degree, their skills or maturity.
It is easy to see why the players feel entitled to accept any gifts that might come their way.
The reasons why college athletes should be paid are significant. The proposed measure brought up by the NCAA would give universities the option to give their athletes 2,dollar stipends. Considering this, is it not obvious that college athletes should receive at least some compensation for their efforts.
Heres Why Sue Lively November 27, at 7: They do it because they make money off how well their team plays. Athletes already receive large amount of financial aid from their schools, covering books, room and tuition.
Do Now. Should college athletes get paid or be allowed to receive sponsorship money? Introduction. College and basketball programs rake in billions of dollars each year through marketing. College athletes are students, not employees Students who play sports should not be paid salaries or allowed to unionize.
College athletes are not employees. They are students. Edit/Update: So I agree to the point that college athletes should be paid more then they currently are, and they should get paid extra for anything extra they do to.
- The scholarships given to college athletes are not sufficient enough to sustain them throughout the year, which is why I believe they should get paid and receive benefits. Student athletes, especially football and basketball players, play a major role in generating revenue for schools, businesses, coaches and the players do not see a penny.
There is only one answer and that is, college athletes should not get paid because it is the worst form of destruction to educational system. College athletes get large scholarships, isn’t that their payment and incentive to be an athlete.
The NCAA recently voted to allow schools to begin compensating its student-athletes for their entire cost of attendance, but economists from Vanderbilt University and the University of Chicago say.College athletes should not get paid